2011 GSP Annual Review – Who Loses?

Over the weekend, the Administration announced the results of the 2011 GSP Annual Review.  You can read the Presidential Proclamation here or, if you’d prefer the non-legalese version, here’s a list from USTR that clearly states the decision for each product.

Although it’s gotten little press, the statistics are quite striking.  Seven products were denied “competitive need limit” (CNL) waivers, or had their existing waiver revoked, effectively immediately.  American companies imported $1.5 billion worth of these products under GSP last year, saving $64 million.  Put differently, these products accounted for nearly 10 percent of total GSP savings last year!

But alas, no more savings for American importers of Thai jewelry or tires, Brazilian lysine, Indian hand-hooked carpets or brake parts, Indonesian aluminum alloy plates, or Turkish refined borax.  (Several other products lost GSP benefits as well, but no importers petitioned for continuation, so we didn’t include them on our list.)

We decided to take a look at which states would be impacted most by the changes based on the estimated 2011 GSP savings.  While far from exhaustive, below is a list of some of the top losers, both overall and for specific products:

  • The leading importers of Thai truck/bus tires, California companies saved $10 million on those imports under GSP last year.  All total, GSP for the products that lost benefits yesterday saved CA companies $14 million in 2011.

  • Maryland accounted for nearly a third of Thai silvery jewelry imports last year, saving more than $11 million.

  • GSP benefits saved for the seven products saved New York companies more than $9 million in 2011, including $7 million on jewelry and more than $1 million each on carpets and aluminum alloy sheets.

  • More than 97 percent of all lysine imports under GSP went to just two states: Illinois and Missouri.  Needless to say, there are some unhappy producers in those states today after GSP benefits that saved $3 million last year were revoked.

  • Lysine importers aren’t the only companies in the Land of Lincoln impacted by the decision: GSP saved Illinois companies more than $2 million last year on brake parts from India – about two-thirds of total U.S. tariff savings for those products under GSP.

  • Georgia companies saved $2.3 million last year on imports of Indian carpets – about one-thirds of total U.S. savings.

  • Finally, New Jersey companies saved $4.2 million on imports of aluminum sheets from Indonesia in 2011 – four times as much as importers in the next largest state.
This entry was posted in Brazil, California, GSP, Illinois, India, Indonesia, Maryland, Missouri, New York, Thailand, Turkey and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to 2011 GSP Annual Review – Who Loses?

  1. Pingback: Import Articles Recap: July 10, 2012 | Imports Work

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s